About Flux, Browsing Suggestions, Archives, Main  
The Umatilla Chemical Depot spans 20,000 acres and stores 12 percent of the nation’s chemical weapons.

Before construction began nobody thought much about the weapons. The residents of Umatilla County weren’t even aware of the nerve agents at the depot until the early seventies, when then-Gov. Tom McCall halted the Army’s plans to ship additional chemical weapons to the depot. Many people in this rural area see no reason to distrust the Army.

A depot employee checks for vapor leaks from the munitions.
But one neighbor doesn’t trust the Army; she believes the safety of her town is her business. Karyn Jones grew up in Hermiston, just 10 miles from the depot. She was as nonchalant about the depot as her neighbors until she took a trip to Hawaii, where a friend told Jones of her struggle to shut down a chemical weapons incinerator on the nearby Johnston Atoll. When the Army announced plans to build an incinerator in Umatilla, Jones believed she had to act. She now leads GASP, a citizens’ environmental group responsible for a lawsuit aimed at revoking the Umatilla incinerator’s construction and operation permits. "No one has any idea what constant low-level exposure from those chemicals will be like," says Jones. She strongly believes that the possibility of a cloud of nerve gas being released into the atmosphere is another reason to halt the project. "In the case of a catastrophic accident I think there’s going to be a significant death rate," she says.

Jared’s mother, Cindy, also is afraid of the possible consequences of incineration. She is one of almost two dozen cosigners, including the Sierra Club, on the GASP lawsuit. "I feel I owe it to my children and their health," she says.

Jared says kids have gotten used to the monthly test sirens at school. "You hear it, and people just keep on playing," he says. Teachers herd the older kids, including Jared, into the gym. The younger kids take shelter in the cafeteria. The Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program (CSEPP) spent millions of federal dollars to equip the gymnasiums and cafeterias of the 11 area schools with pumps and air filters intended to create sealed and pressurized environments safe from exposure.

Jared says there was a broken window in the gym during one such drill. The opening could have rendered the system useless had it been a real emergency. He imagines life inside the gym during an emergency: "Stored frozen food for three days, and then you go home and see your two dogs lyin’ [dead] in the kennel."

Jared isn’t the only one concerned about the drills. "I’ve had teachers tell me their biggest fear is running down the hall with their children and [finding] the door is sealed up. It doesn’t matter if you’re six feet away — they will have to shut the door or risk everyone being contaminated and potentially killed," says Jones.

"I cannot see myself willingly coming back to [this area] if the facility is in operation," Jones says. She fully expects GASP’s lawsuit to revoke the incinerator’s operating permits. "I would be concerned driving down the highway and passing it. If this was being built in Salem, Portland or Eugene they would have never gotten away with any of this nonsense. I feel personally betrayed."

Two munitions handlers prepare to enter a K Block bunker.
Binder says the Army is proud of the history of the depot and the support it has gotten from the community. "The risks, although they’re small, of continued storage are greater than the risks of disposal of this ammunition," she says.

The Army operates another incinerator in Tooele, Utah, 35 miles from Salt Lake City. In December 1998 approximately 140 gallons of sarin spilled while being fed into the incinerator, raising questions about the safety of operations. At a National Press Club news conference on January 11, 2000, Gary Harris, a former chief permit coordinator at the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, claimed that test burn reports were falsified to avoid revealing that the incinerator could not safely burn the agent found in many munitions. "As permit coordinator I was directed to submit modifications to the plant that did not comply with federal law. I reported health, safety and environmental issues to the contractor and the Army, which I was directed not to bring to the attention of the State under the threat of losing my job."

On January 12, the Pentagon said it was confident Harris’ allegations would be proven untrue. "The citizens of Utah and of the United States can rest assured that the Army will continue its mission to effectively and safely eliminate this country’s stockpile of obsolete chemical weapons," said the Army. "This mission will be completed, and the Army will provide maximum protection to the human health and the environment."

Residents of Umatilla have their own reasons to be concerned about the safety of incineration. A mysterious illness struck 36 workers at the Umatilla incinerator construction site on September 15, 1999. Overcome by fumes, some of them began to cough, choke and vomit. Initially the Army thought a possible cause for the illness was toxic fumes created by the heating of materials during the normal construction process. Weeks later Raytheon released a statement saying it found pepper spray contamination in clothing samples, but a U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) analysis failed to confirm those findings.

Lt. Col. Tom Woloszyn holds a chemical model for sarin.

Jones demands to know why the Army can’t positively identify the sickness-inducing agent. "It’s these same people that want us to believe they can safely burn chemical weapons while protecting our community -- I don’t think so."

"From the very beginning there was no reason to believe that the chemical weapons stored at the depot were the cause for the incident," says Binder. "All of the records from monitoring have been reviewed by OSHA and the governor’s commission, as well as other independent evaluators. Every one has supported the depot’s initial finding that chemical agents were not involved in that incident."

Still, Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio shares Jones’ concerns. He wrote to Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber and the media on January 13, 2000, urging the governor to revoke the incinerator’s permits. "We all want these deadly chemicals out of our midst as quickly as possible, but we shouldn’t let the Army stampede us into accepting a chemical weapons incineration plan that poses threats to our state," he wrote.

Kitzhaber responded: "I have no indication that the Oregon experience with the Army and its contractor is similar to that which Mr. Harris describes for Utah. . . . The state has established firm control of the project, and the Army and Raytheon understand that failure to provide information is absolutely unacceptable. . . . I will spare no effort to ensure the safety of our citizens before incineration begins."

The UMCD’s mission of storage and disposal is in the hands of Lt. Col. Tom Woloszyn, the commander of the base. He’s the only active duty Army officer at the depot other than one doctor on a small medical team. Woloszyn moved his family to the area less than a year ago. His youngest son, Jared’s age, drew cartoons for the depot’s newsletter. He likened the mobile detection laboratories to the ice cream truck.

Woloszyn says protection of the public, the workers and the environment are the major considerations in the depot’s storage and disposal missions. "My 180 employees can handle 99 percent of any situation that occurs out there, unless it’s a catastrophic event," he says. "Even in the event of a catastrophe there is time for people to respond according to procedures."

Island Hopping
Private Ranchers, Public Protection
Desert Dwellers
Common Ground
Therapy in the Backcountry
Rediscovering Their Roots
Born of Fire
Taking Back the Power
Burning Questions
sidebar
video
reference
At a Fork in the Road
backwards, back to top, forwards